I've seen 3 answers: 6, 7 and the apparent 'winner' 24. But which is mathematically correct? None, if for no other reason than a problem like this, correctly stated, can have only one answer. This problem is not correctly stated; it is mathematica. (Maoism) A policy stating that peasants should eat together, live together, and labour together. 1970, Translations on People's Republic of China, page 23: If management personnel do not go into the shops and sections to take part in the three togethers and to learn one or more manual skills from the teachers, then they are liable to spend their whole.
I can do the calculations bit by bit, like this: Since f(1) = 2(1) + 3 = 2 + 3 = 5, and since g(5) = –(5) 2 + 5 = –25. Doing the calculations all together. It is because 6, 11 and 7 added together is the same as 3 lots of 8: It is like you are 'flattening out' the numbers. Mean = 3 − 7 + 5 + 13 − 25 = 125 = 2.4. L1 = lower quartile - 1.5.IQ L2 = lower quartile - 3.0.IQ U1 = upper quartile + 1.5.IQ U2 = upper quartile + 3.0.IQ. The line from the lower quartile to the minimum is now drawn from the lower quartile to the smallest point that is greater than L1.
English[edit]
Alternative forms[edit]
Etymology[edit]
Noun[edit]
pl (plural only)
- (Maoism) A policy stating that peasants should eat together, live together, and labour together.
- 1970, Translations on People's Republic of China, page 23:
- If management personnel do not go into the shops and sections to take part in the three togethers and to learn one or more manual skills from the teachers , then they are liable to spend their whole lives in sharp struggle against the working class.
- 1970, Richard Baum, Revolution and Reaction in Rural China:
- Acting under strict orders to practice the 'three togethers' with the peasants, the work team personnel (generally one to three workers per production team) took up residence in the homes of these peasant 'roots.
- 2005, Hans Antlöv & Jörgen Hellman, The Java that Never was: Academic Theories and Political Practices, →ISBN:
- While these studies were not themselves carried out by social scientists, professional social scientists were involved in training and advising the PKI/BTI cadres who carried out the field studies, practicing the 'three togethers,' the four don'ts,' and the 'four musts' in a remarkable forerunner of today's fashionable 'bottom-up,' 'participatory action researh' strategies (White 1993).
Translations[edit]
|
|
Retrieved from 'https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=three_togethers&oldid=54366721'
The equivalent to 'word1337/word' but not incredibly lame and nooblar yet because little to no people use it.
dude, that was totally one three three seven roxxor
Get a one three three seven mug for your dog Helena.
I couldn’t careless (but one must keep up appearances, right?)
Frenemy has a family tragedy. 'Thoughts and prayers.'
Together 3 3 7 13
Get a Thoughts and prayers mug for your papa Vivek.
![Together Together](https://www.creativeblast.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/gerwinbuis04-mooiwark.jpg)
Together 3 3 7 12
Oct 23 trending
Together 3 3 7 16
- 1. Watermelon Sugar
- 2. Ghetto Spread
- 3. Girls who eat carrots
- 4. sorority squat
- 5. Durk
- 6. Momala
- 7. knocking
- 8. Dog shot
- 9. sputnik
- 10. guvy
- 11. knockin'
- 12. nuke the fridge
- 13. obnoxion
- 14. Eee-o eleven
- 15. edward 40 hands
- 16. heels up
- 17. columbus
- 18. ain't got
- 19. UrbDic
- 20. yak shaving
- 21. Rush B Cyka Blyat
- 22. Pimp Nails
- 23. Backpedaling
- 24. Anol
- 25. got that
- 26. by the way
- 27. Wetter than an otter's pocket
- 28. soy face
- 29. TSIF
- 30. georgia rose